The forecast is based
on the historical data, past information, experience and knowledge of recent
events that are likely to affect the future oil and gas markets. Despite a
large amount of information and knowledge, forecasting prices is always
uncertain and unpredictable. Benjamin Disraeli: ‘What we anticipate
seldom occurs, what we least expected generally happens’.
In March 2005, Goldman Sachs said oil could top $100 a barrel, dubbing the
phenomenon a "super spike." But in June 2005, an economist from Morgan Stanley predicted oil prices
could collapse.
The New York Times December 4, 2005. “Some oil executives worry prices
may fall” Cheap oil may once again be just around the corner. Even as
consumers worry about high gasoline prices and rising heating bills, oil
executives in London, Texas
and Saudi Arabia
seem to be concerned about the prospect of falling oil prices.
In a recent speech in Singapore,
John Browne, the chief executive of BP, spoke of a possible sharp drop in
prices and called current levels "unsustainably high."
John Hofmeister, head of Shell Oil in the United States, said during an
interview, "This high price cycle is artificially inflated."
The Observer January 1,
2006 “Bosses predict year of pain”. In the survey of
more than 100 FTSE top executives, MORI found that 66% expect the economy to
worsen in 2006, while 4% believes it will improve. Analysts expecting rampant US growth to
shutter in 2006, little sign of recovery in Euro Zone, and consumer spending at
home still under pressure from rising taxes, businesses have plenty of reasons
to be nervous about the year ahead. The economic climate worried 17% of
executives, with the chairman of a leading mining and natural resources company
citing “uncertainty in the pattern of economic development in China”,
as a concern. Manufacturing sector suffered in 2005 as demand from Euro Zone
remained weak, and high energy prices took their toll.
Danger time for America.
“The economy that Alan Greenspan is about to hand over is in much less
healthy state than is popularly assumed” (The Economist January 12, 2006).
Saudi Arabia's oil minister, Ali al-Naimi, said recently at a news
conference in Riyadh, "As producers, we don't want to build capacity
without demand" – referring to 1998 financial crisis that resulted
in glut in production capacity, sluggish demand that led to oil-price collapse
with futures contracts falling to about $10/barrel.
Despite these headline grabbing reports, most economists and energy
analysts are of the view that the price of oil will probably float between low $40
a barrel and the high $60s for the foreseeable future.
So who’s right? Well, maybe no
one!
Can we live without forecasting?
The forecast we make today is based on best available information, past
experience and the most recent events that influence the oil, gas sector and the
global economy. Nevertheless projecting oil price is always uncertain and
unpredictable. The reasons being that oil price forecast is a complex issue and
dependent on host of factors, some of which are beyond human control. If the
future is uncertain and frequently our forecast turns out to be wrong then why
one makes forecast? Can we live without it? The answer is ‘Yes’ and ‘No’. Despite
the elements of uncertainties, international agencies, multinational oil
companies and consultants do have to forecast. To analyze the potential level
of risk in decision making and to reduce the element of uncertainty in
forecasting, analysts also consider options such as “scenario analysis” which
is a function of the lessons learned, most recent events, and future
perception.
Have we learned from past episodes?
The lessons learned from the past also play an important contribution in
formation of probability distribution and future expectations. George Boole “Probability
is expectation founded upon partial knowledge. A perfect acquaintance with all
the circumstances affecting the occurrence of an event would change expectation
into certainty, and leave nether room nor demand for a theory of probabilities”.
Figure-1 highlights the historical trends of oil prices. At a glance by
visual inspection of the historical trends it is noted that generally oil price
shocks of 1970’s, 1986, 1990 and 1997 were short lived and world oil prices
quickly adjusted or converge towards the historical average prices with slight
variations. For example during 1986 to 2003 oil prices were generally stable
and on an average remain in the twenties. In view of the stability in that
period, predicting oil prices was not as complicated. One important conclusion that can be inferred
from visual inspection of historical trends – generally oil price shocks (both
negative and positive) are short-lived – normally stretching over one-two
years, except for 1973, and eventually quickly converge towards the historical
average due to market fundamentals.
Figure 1: Historical trends of world oil price – 1970/2005
Factors
affecting short-term oil price movements
Most recently oil prices increase strongly in 2004. For example, WTI
increased from $31.16/BBL in 2003 to $41.44/BBL in 2004 and an even more robust
trend was witnessed during 2005 when average annual price increased to $56.47/BBL
(Figure-2). Many factors were responsible for the exceptionally high oil prices
during 2004/2005. The low level of US stocks, high demand, strikes in
Venezuela, civil unrest in Nigeria, refining constraints, hurricanes, insufficient
production capacity due to inadequate investment in the past and fear of supply
disruption due to increasing insurgency in Iraq have certainly contributed to
this unusual elevation in oil prices (Figure-3).
For example, in 2004, China’s oil demand increased by about one million barrels
daily (MMBD) due to surge in car sales owing to easy credit and hot summer that
led to increases usage of diesel generators owing to shortage/rationing/load
shading of electricity. The price of WTI after the Hurricane Katrina increased
to over $ 70/bbl in late August 2005, an all time record in nominal terms and the
highest price since 1981 in real terms (shutting down production platforms,
refineries, pipelines, oil ports in the region affecting security of supply at
least in the short term). Since the introduction of OPEC price band of
$22-28/bbl in February 2000 to January 2005, 47 percent of the times OPEC
managed to stabilize oil prices within its price band, while 8 percent of the
times it was under $22/bbl and 44 percent over $28/bbl. In fact since October
2003 the OPEC basket remains exceptionally higher than the upper band of $28/bbl
forcing OPEC in their 134th meeting to temporarily suspend the price band.
Figure 2: OPEC basket price movement – monthly (nominal terms).
Figure 3: Some factors influencing short-term oil price movements.
How most recent events alter
expectations?
We also make an attempt to compare forecast of oil prices published by international
agencies in 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 and analyze how the expectations have
changed as more information becomes available. Figure-4 draws out the
comparison of Energy Information Administration (EIA’s) Annual Energy Outlook
(AEO’s) for the years 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 (All previous years oil price
forecast have been converted into 2006 dollars for ease of reference). Up until
AEO 2005, EIA’s long-term price forecast more or less remains below $30/BBL.
However this perception changes in AEO-2006 due to persistently higher oil prices
during 2004/2005. EIA’s forecast is significantly stronger as compared to their
previous forecasts. The current oil prices expected to decline marginally to
56.42 in 2006. The prices in the succeeding years expected to continue observe a
gradual declining trend – reaching 44.96/BBL in 2015. Thereafter, oil prices
gradually increases and by 2025 reaches $50/BBL. That is throughout the
forecasting period EIA predicated that world oil prices are likely to hover
around mid-to-upper forties –much stronger than their AEO-2005. It should be
noted that there has been a significant shift in EIA’s thinking about the
future long-term oil price path and all other underlying parameters as compared
to their previous year’s forecasts. EIA is now of the view that oil market is
likely to remain tight during 2006/2025. A strong oil demand is expected in the
USA, China and emerging economies of Asia while combined oil production capacity of OPEC and
non-OPEC is not likely to come forth as previously anticipated – therefore
EIA’s view that oil prices likely to remain between mid-forties to fifties.
Figure 4: Energy Information
Administration World Oil Price Forecast – various Annual Energy Outlook (AEO)
in 2006 $
The Purvin & Gertiz (P&G) predicting that world oil prices in 2006
is likely to remain on the higher side at around $61.63/BBL and then decline
sharply in the next 2-3 years before making a gradual decline reaching at
$34.6/BBL by 2012 (Figure-5). The reason for higher oil price forecast this
year is primarily due to the strong cost pressure on the industry. Their model
predicated that oil prices then likely to gain strength and move gradually
reaching at around $39.72/BBL by 2025. P&G forecast revels that world oil
prices are likely to be remaining within the mid-thirties dollars in real 2006
dollars
.
Figure 5: Purvin &
Gertiz long-term price
forecast
Likewise
International Energy Agency (IEA) also revised its long-term oil price forecast
in 2005 due to persistent higher oil prices in most recent years. IEA oil price
path also shows a declining trend in the years to come reaching at the bottom
at around 2015 and then rises. Throughout the forecast period it appears that
IEA’s expectation are that oil prices most likely expected to remain within
$35-40/BBL (Figure-6). In reference scenario, the price is assumed to ease to
around $35/BBL in 2010 as new crude oil production and refining capacity comes
on stream. It is then assumed to rise slowly, in more or less liner way, to close
to $37 in 2020 and $39/BBL by 2030. The higher oil-price path assumed here than
in World energy Outlook-2004 (WEO) reflects, in part, a recent shift in
producing countries’ price objectives. The assumed slowly rising trend in real
prices after 2010 reflects as expected increase in marginal production costs
outside OPEC, an increase in market share of a small number of major producing
countries and lower spare production capacity. Therefore most of the
incremental demand is expected to be met by OPEC members, mainly in the Middle East. This will increase reliance on OPEC oil and
their ability to influence oil prices. In the reference case it is assumed that
OPEC will not increase oil prices too high and too quickly to avoid reduction
in global oil demand as well as accelerating the development of alternative to
hydrocarbons.
Figure 6: International Energy Agency (IEA)
long-term oil price
forecast
Comparison of latest oil price forecast
Despite difference in magnitude all the three forecasts shows a similar
pattern of declining trend reaching to lowest level to around 2015 followed by
a period of strengthening (Figure-7). The trends also show how the expectations
are changed due to changes in the most recent events particularly that of
status of most recent oil prices. EIA’s perception about the future is tight
market and therefore sees stronger oil prices as compared to others.
Figure 7: Comparison of long-term oil price forecast (2006$)
Why
one see downward oil price movement?
David
O’ Reilly, the chief executive of Chevron, said “High prices tend to
attract higher production and higher supplies. The question then is what will
happen to the demand side? The fact is, we rarely know what is going to happen”.
History
has taught us that continual higher oil prices encourage exploration and
conservation. The first and most important determinant of the level of
exploration activity by international oil companies (IOCs) is the current and
most recent past oil prices. The initial response of the industry to increase
oil prices may not immediately lead to an upsurge in exploration activity, but
possible a reappraisal of discoveries made in mature regions deemed uneconomic
under previous price scenarios. Therefore, exploration activities in new
acreage especially high-risk-high-cost basin are expected to increase after a
year or two in response to current higher oil prices especially if IOC’s
strongly view that current pattern of oil price continue in the future. Oil
companies increase their exploration activities on anticipation in growth in
demand and favorable oil price regimes in the future. Based on these prospects,
these companies are willing to invest in high cost unexplored basins in search
for sizeable oil fields. Increasing exploration activities in new frontier area
will eventually increase oil reserves and production.
In
addition current high oil prices are likely to induce investments in energy
efficient systems; backstop fuel supplies from unconventional crude oil from
tar/tight sands, oil shale, gas to liquid (GTL), coal to liquid (CTL),
clean coal technology and other renewable sources of energy – thus reducing the
pressure on oil demand in the long run. Persistent higher oil prices on the one
hand, increase the supply of crude oil (increase in exploration), increase in
unconventional and renewable sources of energies, and on the other hand, it
will likely to adversely affect the global economy – slowing down oil demand.
Therefore, eventually market forces may push the oil prices downward. Although current higher oil prices have shown
that the global economy has the capacity to withstand un-expected upward surge
in oil prices of this magnitude. However it remains to be seen if this
resilience in the economies can be sustained over an extended period. An
attempt is made in this short paper to assess some of the factors that are
likely to influence future expectations/price forecast. However to comprehend
the subject it requires further depth analysis of each of the underlying
parameters discussed in this paper
Conclusions
Although future is uncertain and highly unpredictable, we do attempt to
forecast oil prices---short and long-term. This analysis could benefit business
plan preparation, investment decision in exploration and development,
feasibility studies, preparing budget, etc. The objective is try to form
expectation based on history, most recent events and how one expect the basic
parameters likely to change in different conditions: economic, geo-political,
environmental and technological breakthroughs. Even though with all the
endeavors, experience and wisdom what we forecast seldom takes place, instead
what least expected happens. Our thrust of learning about the future does not
diminish and we continue to form expectations and carry on with forecasting.
Subsequent events can further review the accuracy of these results. However the concept of scenario analysis
provides an added dimension – defining the band within which oil prices can move
during a particular time period to facilitate the decisions making process.
References:
Jad Mouawad, The New York Times. December 4, 2005. “Some Executives worry prices may fall?”
Energy Information Administration (EIA) various Annual Energy Outlook
International Energy Agency – various reports on World Energy Outlook
Remarks by Governor Ben S. Bernanke, October 21, 2004. At the Distinguished Lecture
Series, Darton College,
Albany, Georgia.
Paul R. La Monica, CNN/Money series writer. July 6, 2005. “Debate raging over oil”.
Ghouri Salman. September 2005. “A
Dilemma of Oil Prices - Short Memories”. PetroMin.
Robert Worcester and Heather Stewart. January 1, 2006. “Bosses predict year of pain”,
The Observer.
Purvin & Gertiz long-term crude oil price forecast, The Economist,
January 12, 2006.
Note: This
paper was published in PetroMin (March 2006 - Website: www.safan.com – The purpose of sharing this paper
is to review our recent past memories and our perception about future
technological development without compromising the basic market fundamentals.
